A tale of 3 airway=pro and cons
yesterday, I completed my experience in 3 flight company in Malaysia finally. The firefly is my last choice at last in my yesterday domestic travel back to KL. My previous priority always Malaysia airline and AIrasia respectively.
First of all , firefly using a small aircraft- a high-wing, twin turboprop aircraft which make the time spent to get down a plane on arrival reduced as small plane means less pessanger vs big plane. Time to take big luggage out from airplane also reduced. In conclusion time saving.The offering of snack in air flight also make it more competitive compare to its main rival -airasia. Finally is the airport is at the Subang airport which is much nearer to LCCT and KLIA. The cons-i think it is mainly a small airplane,if there is turbulance, shakiness a bit higher than both of its competitor, the steadiness of flight less, the last is the noisiness of the plane .
Airasia which claims to be cheapest air fare among all the air craft is not so cheap after all compare to previously except during promotion period or very early booking time not even 2 weeks prior to travelling. The benefit is it got a very comfortable big plane , very nice magazine to read-the 3sixty magazine which is quite rich in contents compare to setia in firefly sponsored by SP setia (not very enjoying to read) .Another good point is that is a bus in LCCT airport. The cons is that is no snack in flight ,you need to buy it on board and very far airport LCCT.
Mas wise is the flight which provide highest airfare with even Business class in domestic flight-definitely the most luxury flight. Big plane with very quiet engines compatible with airasia. The fare relatively higher of all times however the presence of KLIA express make the travelling from KL sentral to KLIA take only around 30 minutes with a reasonable cost. KLIA is also comfortable to travel with. The Mas magazine is also very nice to read with very good photo and contents. The cons mainly is the price, location of airport and the long waiting time to get down from airplane as the plane is big(similar to airasia) however that is direct corridor connecting plane to airport so no need to use umbrella on raint day like airasia and firefly.
In conclusion that is pro and cons in respective air company. The only deciding factor is your choice and favour of the benefit than bares with the cons.
If you search for cost and comfort- go for airasia
If you search for time and comfort-may consider mas
If lokking for distance of airport, time of going down from flight, cost-maybe firefly.
To me, mas still remain my choice if my wallet not too tight at time of travelling.
First of all , firefly using a small aircraft- a high-wing, twin turboprop aircraft which make the time spent to get down a plane on arrival reduced as small plane means less pessanger vs big plane. Time to take big luggage out from airplane also reduced. In conclusion time saving.The offering of snack in air flight also make it more competitive compare to its main rival -airasia. Finally is the airport is at the Subang airport which is much nearer to LCCT and KLIA. The cons-i think it is mainly a small airplane,if there is turbulance, shakiness a bit higher than both of its competitor, the steadiness of flight less, the last is the noisiness of the plane .
Airasia which claims to be cheapest air fare among all the air craft is not so cheap after all compare to previously except during promotion period or very early booking time not even 2 weeks prior to travelling. The benefit is it got a very comfortable big plane , very nice magazine to read-the 3sixty magazine which is quite rich in contents compare to setia in firefly sponsored by SP setia (not very enjoying to read) .Another good point is that is a bus in LCCT airport. The cons is that is no snack in flight ,you need to buy it on board and very far airport LCCT.
Mas wise is the flight which provide highest airfare with even Business class in domestic flight-definitely the most luxury flight. Big plane with very quiet engines compatible with airasia. The fare relatively higher of all times however the presence of KLIA express make the travelling from KL sentral to KLIA take only around 30 minutes with a reasonable cost. KLIA is also comfortable to travel with. The Mas magazine is also very nice to read with very good photo and contents. The cons mainly is the price, location of airport and the long waiting time to get down from airplane as the plane is big(similar to airasia) however that is direct corridor connecting plane to airport so no need to use umbrella on raint day like airasia and firefly.
In conclusion that is pro and cons in respective air company. The only deciding factor is your choice and favour of the benefit than bares with the cons.
If you search for cost and comfort- go for airasia
If you search for time and comfort-may consider mas
If lokking for distance of airport, time of going down from flight, cost-maybe firefly.
To me, mas still remain my choice if my wallet not too tight at time of travelling.
posted by M K at
4:26 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home